Why is building Ram Mandir at Ayodhya so important for so many Hindus? History of Ram Mandir !

This is Mecca, the birthplace of Prophet Mohammad :

Beautiful isn't it?

This is Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus Christ :

All my Christian brethren must be feeling joyful upon seeing this picture

This is Ayodhya, the birthplace of Lord Ram :

Will any Hindu feel ecstatic about it? NO

The Ram Janmabhoomi belongs to the Hindus. There are various evidences regarding this :

  • All Persian, Arabic and Urdu history written in 18–19th century closely say that Babar destroyed Ram Mandir :
    • Tarik-e-Avdi : It was written in 1869 but published in 1969. The author of this book is an eye witness account of developments that took place there like Hindus paying bribes to the incharge of Babri Masjid to be able to worship in Masjid.
    • Akbar gave land to Hanuman Tila which was renewed in 1973 and the scribe says “This grant being renewed, I am writing this from the Janmbhumi of Ram”.
  • Many left historians proclaim that Sri Tulsidasji never mentioned about destruction of Ram Mandir in his text :
    • In a lesser known text, Doha Sataka, Tulsidas ji clearly mentions, in the 5th verse, about the destruction of Ram Temple
  • From 1822 this case has been recorded in district courts :
    • An official, Hafizullah, submitted a note in Faizabad district court saying that Babri Masjid was built after destroying Ram Temple
    • Allahabad High Court said that till 1855 the Hindus had free access to the Masjid.
    • A thanedar of Awadh filed an FIR in 1858 stating that 25 Sikhs have started Hawan in Masjid and have written ‘Ram’ inside the Masjid. Thus there was a constant tussle for claim on Ram Mandir.
  • In 1949, an idol of Lord Ram was placed in Ayodhya and no one protested. But when Mr. Nehru came to know about it, he wrote the the CM of UP that this will damage India’s relations with Pakistan and Kashmir(I have no idea how!!).
  • When Babri Masjid was brought down in 1992, Vishnu Hari incription was discovered. It tells that some king of some state had built Ram Mandir.
  • ASI’s findings :
    • ASI was called to excavate the site in 2003 by the Allahabad HC.
    • In the 10th century a huge temple existed there.
    • In the 12 century, a new temple was built over the previous one.
  • For 65 years, all court decisions went in our favour :
    • December 1949 for Murti Pujan.
    • February 1986 for the opening of locks.
    • November 1992 : For the laying of foundation stone.
    • December 1992 : Permission for makeshift temple.
    • September 2010 : The sanctum sanctorum was given to Ram Lalla, proving that it is indeed Ram Janmsthan. The court gave 2/3rd of land to the Hindus and the rest to the Muslims

To all those who wish a hospital in place of a temple :

Hospital can be built anyhwere but the spiritual significance of the land demands a temple be built there. I also want to ask such people that if their land tomorrow gets into any dispute will they then advocate for a Hospital there?

To all those who keep asking “Why dig the history and change things that were a result of Kingly conflicts?” :

  • The Rashtrapati Bhawan was constructed by Lutyen for the Viceroys of British India and was called Viceroy’s House. It was only after Dr. Rajendra Prasad became the President of India in 1950 that its name was changed.
  • The name of Calcutta was changed to Kolkata

There have been changes made to buildings, cities etc. to erase the history of invaders. So why not build a Ram Mandir to erase the history of the barbaric Babar.

Ram is an exemplar of the Dharmic traditions of this land of Bharat. Even our Constitution contains the painting of Lord Ram :

Even Gandhiji’s notion of Swaraj was Ram Rajya. Lord Ram is in the heart of every Indian and we have spontaneous devotion for Lord Ram.

I wanted to name many left historians who have given ridiculous arguments in court but that may result in Quora collapsing my answer, thus I avoided it. Although you can jump to 55:50 part of the video and watch thereon about who these left historians are.

At last, I just want to say :

Because India is a Hindu majority nation, we Hindus are taking the legal route otherwise the discourse would have been different.

Jai Shri Ram!

Previous Post Next Post